In this research1 from the Journal of Medical and Aesthetic Dermatology, board-certified dermatologist Babar Rao, M.D., FAAD, a professor of dermatology and pathology at Robert Wooden Johnson Medical College, and fellow researchers randomly assigned 60 contributors with zits scars and deeper pores and skin tones to 2 teams.
They in contrast two completely different therapies, one being a chemical peel with 35% glycolic acid and the opposite a microneedling session—each administered each two weeks for 12 weeks.
In case you are unfamiliar, microneedling includes tiny sterilized needles that pierce the pores and skin and stimulate collagen manufacturing, thus encouraging the pores and skin to heal—in flip, the strategy helps cut back the looks and depth of zits scars.
Chemical peels, however, do precisely what you’d anticipate—chemical exfoliants are used to take away the highest layer of the pores and skin. The pores and skin that grows again as a replacement is probably going smoother and free from discoloration. This helps to reduce the looks of zits scars, too.
So what did the researchers discover? Microneedling offered higher therapy outcomes in comparison with 35% glycolic acid peels in sufferers with darker pores and skin tones.
This research marks a significant stride on this planet of zits scar therapies: Whereas chemical peels should be a superb possibility for some (if it really works for you, it really works!), microneedling could exhibit even higher outcomes for zits scars, particularly for these with melanin-rich pores and skin. As at all times, attempt to chat with a dermatologist earlier than reserving any of those therapies.
